Recent Updates RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Tiffany von Emmel 10:29 pm on August 29, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Honoring Home 

    Last night was “Honor Home”,  the first gesture of the At Home project. It was quite an experience. Below are slideshows of home makers at play and the homes that people have made so far.

    With the Home Team keeping our transformative learning hats on, Paul Loper asked me what I had discovered so far as a result of the At Home project. In answer….

    I have increased my awareness of my experience of home.

    Home is presence. Presence with oneself,
    with each other, with the earth.

    Feeling at home is something to cultivate in oneself. Through each breath, through appreciating, caring, resting, eating, choosing consciously.

    As we interact with our environment, we may have the illusion that home is about making a nest full of physical things, but is it, really?

    The act of making an external place called home is simply a way to cultivate the internal experience of home.  Consciously and unconsciously, we nest to make a vessel for feeling at home.
    The more we experience being at ease in our self, even as we move across multiple places and  situations, the more connected and resilient we become.
    This then speaks to the importance of play. Playing house in relationship, playing with being at home as a way to come home.
    There is no place like home, Toto.
    Please share here and there: What is home to you? When are you at home?
    Upload photos to Flickr group: #AtHome
    Tweet: #AtHome
     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 5:04 pm on August 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Relational Value – what impact do we want to make together? 

    There is $120 billion dollars in the U.S social capital market, money waiting to be spent on social good, according to Hope Consulting’s new report. Imagine what that investment could do for alleviating poverty. Why are investors interested in investing in a better world?

    Because money is not the thing. People use money to create what they really want – belonging, health, peace, making a difference and environmental balance.  People are choosing to lead a simpler life and give back to society more (London School of Economics, Boston Consulting Group).

    Now, to free up this value for good is another thing. We need new new business models, organization design and social processes grounded in the new paradigm of a relational economy. The Dreamfish cooperative is building such a relational economy. We  are developing value tools that are grounded in the fundamental idea that development flourishes in connection, not control.

    Every Friday, we host a Leadership Lab to explore new ideas in “human work” and relational economy. This last Friday, I introduced this Relational Value model. This model is the outcome of a Dreamfish Labs project started in 2009 by Paul Loper, Peter Kaminski and Marguerite Manteau. The first phase of the Value Project focused on what is value and how do we relate to it? Do we create it, exchange it, transfer it? At what moments of work collaboration do we experience it? What kind of social software tools enable us to generate value? The second phase has led to a codified map of categories and processes that are grounded in both an analysis of Dreamfish member experience and research in micro-enterprise development and human development.

    Want to swim a little? Here are the notes and  audio-recording (available for limited time).

    There are three views of the Relational Value model. The first graphic above shows you “what is value”. The second below shows you “how do we get there”. The third graphic shows what the experience is that social designers and change agents design for.

    The Relational Value Map above is an analytical tool. It offers individuals and teams a tool to make meaning and evaluate what kinds of impact you want to make.  These five categories have subcategories.

    • Belonging includes family, friends, and community.
    • Wellness includes food, shelter, physical safety, health, security.
    • Achievement includes quality, productivity, self-worth, self-efficacy, self-confidence.
    • Development includes learning, collaboration, human and enterprise development
    • Global care includes peace, human rights, and sustainability.

    The Relational Value Flow above is the “how we get there”. It is iteritive and agile. 

    The colours on the model correspond to the pyramid shown above, now shown in a process.
    Connect out loud – We grow through relationship, rather than a heroic journey.  Connectivity also builds the ground for resilience as the chemical oxytocin floods us. In marriages, the number of frequent interpersonal  “bids for connection” and a low number of criticisms per hour is a good indicator of whether a relationship will last (Gottman). Connection bids help us develop empathy and sympathy, what neureconomist, Paul Zak describes as “the “social glue” that adheres families, communities, and societies, and as such, acts as an “economic lubricant” that enables us to engage in all sorts of transactions.”

    Work out loud –  Open Source your Life!  When we allowing our selves to show up without the perfect thing or the completed thing, we give the signal to others that is o.k. to be a life-long learner. By opening up and working out loud, we are helped to learn from each other. This spreads value….

    Value Out Loud — At the end of a meeting or project, reflect or evaluate value has been created. Use the value map to assess belonging, wellness, economic impact, learning, social impact.  This enables you to share the love…
    Give Out Loud –  As we recognize abundance and our development, we become more generous.   Mecahnisms such as Dreamfish’s Give as You Grow 10% contribution enables people to give.
    Spread out Loud – Show your impact. Do not hide it under a bed or rock. Whether quantitative financial spreadsheets or qualitative stories,  images and guides, create “reifications” of your value to inspire others to generate more value.

    The Relational Value Experience describes the individual’s experience. This is helpful for designing a social experience.   You know your design is in the right direction when individuals say things like this. To paraphrase Nancy White, “we build social software for networks of people, but it is individuals who experience it.”

    What’s under the hood? The Relational Value model is built from an analysis of Dreamfish member experience through a lens of my research in knowledge and relational culture design. The map correlates with Relational Cultural theory’s growth-in-connection, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Brian Hall’s Value Technology. ( For a deeper reading, you can read about these types of impact in a case story I wrote of a Dreamfish project to build an organizational culture of resilience and sustainability in Innovations in Transformative Learning, chapter 10. )

    Commodity thinking versus relational thinking?
    I’ll leave you with a great quote from last Friday’s Dreamfish Leadership Lab. Leonard Perlson told a great story that illustrates the difference between the Value as commodity or value that is growthful. (Leonard is our new Dreamfish finance lead, has decades of experience as a CFO of private family offices, a social impact investor and in developing artists at the Leonard Perlson Gallery in NYC.)   Leonard says,

    The difference between trading value and creating value is the difference between trading a Picasso and developing an artist.

    People are artists of life. Let’s develop the next billion out of poverty.

    Want to dive more into value? A terrific upcoming opportunity is upon us. The social capital marketspace is forming at the SOCAP conference, October 4-6th. Let’s do it!

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 12:21 pm on August 16, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: human development, relational theory,   

    “Growth occurs in connection. described… 

    “Growth occurs in connection. There are five good things that characterize a growth-fostering relationship: 1) increased zest (vitality), 2) increased ability to take action (empowerment), 3) increased clarity (a clearer picture of one’s self, the other, and the relationship), 4) increased sense of worth, and 5) a desire for relationships beyond that particular relationship. These five good things describe the outcomes of growth-fostering relationships, that is, the outcomes when growth occurs through mutual empowerment and mutual empathy; we grow not toward separation, but toward greater mutuality and empathic possibility.”

    Jean Baker Miller (1986)
     
    • Nnenna 2:40 pm on August 16, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Will add ‘Freedom’. Freedom to undertake, freedom to explore, freedom from fear of failure and freedom to innovate.

      • Tiffany von Emmel 5:05 am on August 22, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Freedom from oppression is the freedom from inhibitors to growth-fostering relationship. Oppression of all kinds – Oppressive work environments, sexism, racism, heterosexism, classism, colonialism — inhibit individuals’ ability to innovate, explore, learn and take risks. The suffering that comes with disconnection and alienation happens, not just at individual and family level, but at this social/cultural shaping of self.

    • Kate McAlpine 4:54 am on August 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      This is similar to a paper I’ve recently written on the role of the connected relationship in fostering resilience in street youth. Will email it to you :) But essentially a connected relationship is marked by the A,B,C,D and E of contingent communication where the adult:
      - Affirms and approves of where the youth is now, not where they want them to be,
      - Believes in a positive future and outcomes,
      - Collaboratively identifies strengths,
      - Demonstrates receptivity to non-verbal signals,
      - Endeavours to be consistent, predictable, sensitive and perceptive.
      The connected relationship is characterised by the heart qualities of loving kindness, tenderness, care, self-compassion, and love (Germer, 2006). This applies both to the adult and to the youth, since such relational mindfulness requires that we be both present and receptive to ourselves before we can enact that state with others (Front, 2008). The aim of mindfulness is to “evoke a complete state of mind” (Germer, 2006) where we can be present in the moment.
      All food for thought xxx

      • Tiffany von Emmel 5:08 am on August 22, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Kate, this sounds terrific! Would you share a link to your paper here?

        Miller, a psychiatrist, published a ground-breaking book on human development in 1970s and in 1980′s, with a collaborative inquiry group of colleagues, founded Stone Center at Wellesley which has sponsored research on social justice and Relational Cultural Theory (RCT). A core tenet of RCT is that opportunities for growth occur through social/cultural connection. A couple of references.

        Christina Robb, “This Changes Everything”, chapter 1 in NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/12/books/chapters/0312-1st-robb.html?_r=1

        Jean Baker Miller Institute, Wellesley: http://www.jbmti.org/content/view/1754/328/

    • Kate 1:18 am on August 22, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Hi Tiff – a morning of twittering, facebooking and blogging – does it ever end? Link to my paper here http://www.roho-tz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/KA702_In-depth_Enhancing-resilience-in-street-children_McA_final.pdf xxx

    • Tiffany von Emmel 5:18 am on August 22, 2010 Permalink

      Thank you, Kate! I look forward to reading. xo, t

  • Tiffany von Emmel 9:48 pm on August 15, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Leadership is not located essentially in the first person. Leadership is a pattern in the interaction between the dancers.

    Thank you Kristin Lingman for sending this along :)

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 2:25 pm on August 15, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    At HOME – an invitation 

    What is Home? When are we at Home? Where is Home?

    Dietmar and I are starting a participatory art project over three months, called “At HOME with Tiffany and Dietmar”.  I invite you to join us. This may or not surprise you, depending on which context you know us from. So, here is  the backstory and a meta-story [but not meta-data] about participatory design thinking

    Why At HOME

    Dietmar and I met in 1998. We met as change agents who had both come to work and learn with Anna Halprin, a pioneer in collaboration methodology and community choreographer for social change. Anna and Lawrence Halprin, environmental architect, are known as leading social design thinkers across disciplines in design, health, psychology, and systems sciences. Anna had developed her work as part of her recovery from colon cancer.  I related to Anna’s path, as my journey with Ulcerative Colitis over fifteen years has focused my work similarly on creating resilient processes of organizing networks in unpredictable environments.  In this shared ground of participatory design thinking, Dietmar and I began our life and work together as collaborators. We started up Improvisation Labs, developing transformative learning groups in East Berlin.  We led tranformative inquiry labs for change agents and communities. We then founded Dreamfish in 2006.

    Meanwhile in the background, what has enabled us to take these risks to innovate for a decade was a wonderful physical home in San Francisco. How we have this home is a story unto itself about participatory design thinking…

    I had arrived in San Francisco in Fall, 1997. I was in midst of a series of surgeries at Cedar Sinai Hospital to stabilize my health after years of learning to live every moment in the unknown. Now, I wanted to start fresh in San Francisco.  I came to San Francisco with little but I knew a few extraordinary people.  And, it was the Dot com goldrush days of 80 people standing in line for one vacant apartment.  But, finding a home in these conditions felt doable. I had become comfortable working with the ambiguity of the unknown, a positive outcome of uncertain health.

    Here was my process for finding a home – in design terms, here is the”Score”…

    I didn’t look in the paper for listings (starting with data and information), then fill out an application (more data, information), and end up with a transactional contract (more data). Nor did I “solve a problem” and fix it.  Instead, I started with connection. I connected to my own wonderment. I then connected with someone who knows me and whose way of Hominess I appreciated.  I asked Doug Paxton. Doug said, “Check out Noe Valley.  Its sunny, peaceful, and close to the Castro. My intuition is that you will like it.” I listened and paid attention. Then, I connected with the place, walking the neighborhood. Increasing the participatory pattern, I then connected with more people and had more conversations.

    I talked with elderly people, because they were the most connected. They knew the place and people (They had relational knowledge).  Within a few hours, I had a new friend, Angie, who then introduced me to Mel, her neighbor.  Mel was in his 80′s and hadn’t rented his second story of his building for years. We became  friends. I renovated the flat. Mel rented the flat to me for a very low rate. My friend, Urusa Fahim, joined me and the home enabled us to focus on our doctoral studies.   Then, Dietmar and I met, and we all became family to each other.

    For 12 years, Mel, Dietmar and I have shared household resources, shopped for groceries, gone out to dinner and to the doctor’s office. We have cared for each other as human beings. In the process, we have together reduced our environmental footprints and our costs. We have learned together. With his Depression era frugality, Mel helped us become more resource-conscious, inspiring our Clothesline Laundry behaviors.  Mel now uses a cordless phone.  This “landlord-tenant” interaction has been a practice of Home (practical knowledge). It is also an example of how the property rental business can be Human Work.  We traveled, lived sometimes in Berlin, but always came home to Mel.

    This every day know-how of Home has nurtured greater capacity from which we do our work to enable social impact (ie. Responsive knowledge). We owe much gratitude to our Home.

    Now, Mel has moved to a nursing home in Washington, and the family is selling our house. We are sad about parting from Mel and our home. But, rather than seeing this transition as a problem to solve, we’re looking at this as an opportunity to connect with what matters and start a new life.

    Oy! Where will we live? you might ask. We’re not there yet. We’ll start with connection.  We’ll start with gratitude and honoring of Home. We’ll reach out to connect with you. This practice of increasing participation will gives rise to knowing what our new home will be. How?  Here is our Score for we will emerge in a new home (Axiom: Improvisation requires Agile planning.) …

    How At HOME: the Score

    The Score has four phases:

    1. Honor Home – Appreciate our experience of home. Invite participation in the appreciation

    2. Go Home! – Digitally increase participation.

    3. Discover Home – Explore new spaces to inhabit and call home.

    4. Inhabit Home – We inhabit a new home.

    Timeline

    August 28th: Honor Home
    Aug 28 – Sept 30: Go Home!
    October 1 – December 31: Discover Home
    January, 2011: Inhabit Home

    Roles/People

    Home Hosts: Tiffany/Dietmar
    Honor Home

    Go Home!
    • Tweet at: #AtHome
    Discover Home
    • Home hunters
    Inhabit Home
    • Moving helpers

    1. Honor Home

    August 28th

    • 5pm – Home installation
    • 7pm – Home Team huddle
    At Door landing (1 Greeter)
    8pm – 10pm
    • People are greeted warmly.
    • Greeter explains the score for the evening.
    • Each person is given a paper-cut Home and put their name on it.
    At Stairs
    • Each person removes shoes, places on stairs on right side, pair per stair step. When full, then on landing.
    At Hallway (1 Greeter)
    • Jackets and bags go on bed.
    • People get a view at the front-room Installation to understand context of where their paper-cut home will go later.
    At Kitchen (Kitchen Facilitator)
    • People prepare and serve food and drinks to each other and enjoy
    Living room HOME Installation
    5-8pm -Transformation of space into a container for unfolding HOME
    • Empty the space. Cover cabinets and bookshelves with freshly washed linens
    • Hang clothes lines within reach across room
    • People pin the paper-cut HOME icons to the lines with clothes pins
    8-10pm
    • 8-9:45pm People create paper-cut home icons with visual art materials.
    • People enter space to unfold an inquiry into HOME

    Want to get involved?

    Please participate here on this blog and…
    • Tweet about what is HOME at: #AtHome
    • Share photos of HOME at Flickr Group: #AtHome

    What is Home to you? When are you at Home? Where is Home? How did you discover your home?

     
    • Lisa 1:52 pm on August 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I am a home body, no question about it. Home is definitely my physical house in Oakland. Being a practitioner of yoga, I sometimes worry about my attachment to the stability and safety it provides — our home is blocks from the Hayward fault. But mostly I am just grateful for the pleasures of cooking in my kitchen, puttering in my vegetable garden, hanging the wash on my clothesline, chatting with neighbors, and settling in on the couch for a movie night with my husband and dog. To me, home means simple pleasures.

    • Jill 9:29 am on August 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Home is where I am. Home is inhabiting reality and the present moment completely. Home is embodying self and having space to connect, create, + contemplate.

    • Paul 10:15 am on August 26, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      safety, ease, dropping of “public personae,” intimacy, eros, foolishness, awkwardness, deep recuperation, trust, familiarity, reliability, creative opportunity, productivity, reflection, expression, hosting, cleaning, organizing, decorating, maintaining, …..

    • Nnenna 3:30 pm on August 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I have five homes and building one right now.

      I come from a quaint little village in the eastern part of Nigeria in West Africa. We had a family tragedy when my father was assassinated at ‘home’ . This triggered a wave of traumatic reactions in the family. So we packed my mom and siblings and just left home. So all three houses are empty.

      We rented a small place in the nearest town. We did not want my mother to lose the attachment but we needed everyone safe. The new place is smaller and space is not really there. But it is home. Because that is where the family members feel safe.

      My partner and I have a place in Accra, Ghana. Nice neighborhood in the chic part of town. There is a huge mango tree there and whenever it fruits, the whole neighbors get a real feast! The house has got a large sitting court and we have enjoyed gallons freshly-made fruit juice there. This place represents calm and quietness for us

      My partner also has another house in the western part of Ghana – Takoradi, actually it is called Esipong hill. The house is behind a stadium and overlooks the Atlantic ocean! Beautiful place. We are gently moving from Accra to Esipong now. Lots of fixing to do. Lots of future plans too.

      I am doing this reply from Abidjan in another apartment. It is pure white – pillars, rooms, floor, walls everything. A friend of mine had the place but refused to let it go. We both decided to make it a home. A peaceful place. To an extent that has been a success. It has become a kind of refuge to many people. They actually come just to ‘feel’ the peace and ‘be at home’.

      A new house is being built now. We call it ‘Lot 17′. It is a different experience. We have been building it from literally ‘ground 0′. The structure is up, the tiles are now being laid. I have a special attachment to Lot 17. Like raising a child! So many heartaches but far more joys!

      So here are to all the homes where we have memories, find safety, find calm, dream of the future, seek refuge, and construct our dreams.

  • Tiffany von Emmel 3:29 pm on August 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    The adventurous turns in a body of knowledge 

    Units of knowledge are primarily concrete: embodied, incorporated, lived. Knowledge is about situatedness. Francisco Varela

    Lately, I find myself serendipitously in conversations about the body and knowledge. Last night, in an inspiring meeting of the Global Women Leadership Network, the group facilitator was Susan Geear, whose practice is in somatics and leadership.  In the group, a woman asked, “To act as transformative leaders, do we need more knowledge?” My response – More is not necessarily better.  What is important is to shift our embodied understanding of knowledge and knowledge practices. Later in the evening, a participant led us in an exercise of feeling our feet on the ground, standing for our vision, imagining our vision of human rights, and breathing.

    This story above tell of a moment in an inquiry into “knowledge in the age of participation”.

    My journey is like a spiral with four turns….

    In the first turn, my interest in the “body as a teacher of knowledge” began in 1984 as I entered the field of  somatics, to help adults practice presence with our self, in relationship and in small groups.  My questions were about health and empowerment. What I learned along the way was that we came to know through  the practice of presence.  ( “Somatics” is the study of the lived experience of the body. For software folks, somatics is a close neighbor to User Experience Design. For researchers, somatics is close to Phenomenology. )

    In the second turn, in 1995-2001, my interest jumped to the Use of Self in a larger system, and I entered the field of Organization Development consulting, working with nonprofit networks and media companies that were shifting from pushing “content” at people to becoming human work communities.  How can we help to transform a system through our use of self? What can the body teach us as an agent of social change But, what I saw entering Organization Development were conceptions of organization as machines and rational approaches to Change Management and Knowledge Management that had more to do with control than connection.

    In the third turn of inquiry, in 2001, I began to ask meta-questions – What is knowledge and knowledge practices that cultivate a thriving world? Given that we live a participatory world, given that our bodies are common to humanity and the earth, what can the body teach us about  of knowledge?

    This began a new quest into sustainability that evolved forms of collaborative labs for sustainability with organizational consultants, systems scientists, organizational theorists, sustainability MBA educators, and Buddhist practice.   I then codified my understanding of knowledge in research and a doctoral dissertation.

    In the current fourth turn, I am immersed in the challenge of enabling global participation. Dreamfish is this inquiry.

    Enough for now. Going to participate in the Global Innovation Dialogue tonight. A very cool moment in this turn ;-)

    In the next blog post, I will open a conversation on what is knowledge in the age of participation.

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 3:14 pm on March 7, 2010 Permalink  

    Practice Community as a Way 

    On this Sunday, I would like to share a personal story with you and invite you to join in building Dreamfish. My call to share of myself is inspired from a heartful group conversation the other night after my Ignite presentation of the  Humanifesto, reflecting with Lisa Chu, Eugene Kim, Van Riper of Community Leadership Summit. Thank you to all of you for reminding me of what matters.

    If you heard the Ignite presentation, this story gives you where I am coming from. This particular story today is inspired by an article that Peter Kaminski just shared with me about Learning from the Trappist Monks about business. Reading the article a reminded me of my own love for building Dreamfish as a practice community.

    Once upon a time …

    … I lived a life as a NY socialite, a marketer in a media startup, a model and an actor, with over 1,000 performances under my belt, mentored by Sandy Meisner.  And, I was 19 yrs old. I had what appeared to be everything society teaches us is valuable to a young American woman. My “friends” were rockstars, and I was engaged to a prominent heir in an American oil and steel family. But, really, what I was becoming aware of was a deep sense of alienation. Participating in the power games of the office during the day, the stage at night, drunken polo games at country mansions, posturing in night club backrooms, and wasting fuel and energy on private jet trips and a closet of designer clothes, my life was poor. Having grown up early on from a hard-working family of garage entrepreneurs, then rapidly impacted by my mother’s whirlwind l success in advertising, I came as an outsider into the old money world. Because I was an outsider, I could see the water we were swimming in.   I saw I was drowning, but I kept drinking the water.

    One day, as I was getting off stage, staring at a crowd of people, I had an epiphany moment. Time stopped still and a sense of awe filled me as I really took the people in. I became aware of emptiness in me and the distance I felt from the people in front of me. This moment was a disorienting dilemma (in the language of transformative learning). In the midst of so much affluence, I felt poor. I had been seeking ways to shore up my sense of self, seeking to achieve, seeking to be loved. I was seeking connection through a paradigm of dominance, not a paradigm of relationship. I had forgotten where I had come from. I had been acting out the dominant stories our society has given us about being human.

    The next day, I began to seek a new life and a new model for work. I was walking into the unknown, and had no idea what I would do. In high heels and a Norma Kamali dress, I walked off a New York City street into a dojo. As I walked in the door of the dojo, a man dressed in a white martial arts outfit made me a cup of tea and offered it to me.  He bowed and said, “Thank you”.

    I had just met Wataru Ohashi, who had brought Shiatsu from Japan to the West. Ohashi became my mentor for years to come. More significantly, I entered a practice community. In the community, I practiced being of service to each person I met. I practiced being present with myself and another. At the end of each Shiatsu session, the giver bows and says to the receiver, “thank you”,  because of the value received in giving.

    It didn’t matter what kind of work I did. We sometimes worked in a Zen monastery, surrounded by nature. Whether I taught a class or I cleaned the bathroom or I meditated, I was practicing service, presence, and ethical standards of quality. In this practice, I encountered myself – my judgments and insecurities, where I held tight and where I grasped. I discovered that when I experienced presence with another or task, I found the joy in myself.  As I practiced in community, I let go of old patterns, and sought out simplicity – growing a big community garden, living with less, sharing what I had. One weekend, my old friends visited me on their way to a hunt. Waving to them from an old tractor, in overalls, covered in manure, I felt happy.

    As I practiced in community, I discovered the earth beneath my feet, for I knew I was part of life. And, as I learned, I began teaching. My students were often mid-life executives, seeking to be generative in the second half of life. And as I taught and coached for the next ten years, I learned more about myself. When I practiced, I culitivated fullness in the knowing of not knowing. I became full in practicing connection. Connected, I felt free.

    As I practiced service in community, my mental models shifted to network thinking. As an entrepreneur, my ideas about marketing and business models shifted from pushing things at people to building value communities.

    Dreamfish is a practice community, where through showing up with faith, being of service, crafting quality work, mentoring and learning, we cultivate that which we seek. We have formed Dreamfish as a cooperative, a work cooperative with a business model fundamentally grounded in relationship. We craft every day work in this ground of relationship – relationship to ourselves, each other, the earth and our relations.  As we practice, our basic needs can be met, while we embrace our humanity and move our world.  We truly can create the work we want.

    If you feel called in this story, please consider to join with me  in building the Dreamfish cooperative. Let’s build a work community that serves us all.

    Please, take the moment to sign up. While a “profile” online has turned into commodity, I ask you to consider crafting your profile as a practice of presence. Consider to share from your heart what matters to you, and how you would like to join with others in the community.

    Yes, creating a human way to work is a practice of walking into the unknown. Let’s walk in together, light the fire and put on a pot of tea :-)   http://dreamfish.com/beta

    If you wish to share this with friends and invite them to join us, please do.

    Thank you,

    Tiff

     
    • Lisa Chu 2:34 pm on March 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Somehow I’m just seeing this post today! So many weeks after our conversation at Ignite, I am really moved by your writing. I told your story to Gail Larsen of as an example of changing the world by telling your own story.

      Keep sharing and changing the world, Tiff!

    • Lisa Chu 2:35 pm on March 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Sorry, I meant to post a link to Gail Larsen’s Real Speaking – http://www.realspeaking.net

    • vonemmel 6:54 pm on April 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Lisa, thanks for your feedback. Much appreciated! I will share more.

  • Tiffany von Emmel 8:35 am on October 24, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: Co-Entrepreneurship   

    350 – An act of co-entrepreneurship 

    Entrepreneurship requires the physical act of stepping up to act for something. But, the idea of entrepreneurship being a solo heroic act is a narrative that should be challenged. Co-entrepreneurship is a new form of enterprise in which we join together to mutual support our dreams in an ensemble vision of a better world. Together, we are stronger, and we are moving forward.

    35o is a performative act of co-entrepreneurship. Today, thousands of people throughout the world are taking part in actions to raise awareness about the number, 350.

    350 parts per million is what many scientists, climate experts, and progressive national governments are now saying is the safe upper limit for CO2 in our atmosphere….To get there, we need a different kind of PPM-a “people powered movement” that is made of people like you in every corner of the planet.

    Wherever you are today, you can participate. Since I am at a day for bloggers at Public Media Collaborative,I am writing this blog post as a 350 action.

    Let’s move to 350, co-entrepreneurs!

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 3:41 pm on August 23, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: , New Ways to Work,   

    Dreamfish Humanifesto 

    [Note: the Humanifesto has evolved with tweaks and nudges. The current version is here. ]

    We want to flourish.

    We want a workplace, where everyone can create meaningful work. We can find happiness. We can thrive in our livelihoods.

    Dreamfish was born to create a new open world of good work for everyone, everywhere. Dreamfish is for us, all of us – the world’s women to work, get capital, move out of poverty or reenter a workforce or work in open source, for men to explore freely new ways to feel at work, for a person in recovery from anything to make a living, for a young genius to stretch wide, for elders to contribute experience, for the homeless to gain confidence, for a professional to learn creative out of the box skills, for the investor to contribute to what matters, for a young worker to gain meaningful work experience, free of silos. This is sustainability at work. This is ”our” world of work.

    We are welcoming. You may speak Urdu, Spanish or Chinese. You may identifiy as a woman or a man. You may wear a baby sling, hijab, a kippah, a suit, leather, piercings, a pentacle, a political badge, a rainbow, a rosary, tattoos, or something we can only dream of. You may carry a backpack, a guitar or knitting needles or a cane. Conservative or liberal, libertarian or socialist — we believe it’s possible for people of all viewpoints and persuasions to be agents of entrepreneurship. We welcome youth and elders, mothers, activists, professionals, artists, engineers, bloggers, crafters, academics, musicians, photographers, readers, writers, gardeners, ordinary people, extraordinary people, and everyone in between. We welcome people who want to change the world, people who want to do business, people who want to keep in touch, people who want to make great art. We welcome Internet beginners.

    We will thrive at work.
    In our future, we want for millions of us to have created more meaningful work, moved out of poverty, completed thousands of successful projects, and grown as people. We want to:
    *Increase sustainable income – Those of us who are below the poverty line will significantly increase our income and report an income that enables us to be self-sufficient.
    *Resilience – The Survival rate of micro-enterprises is extraordinarily high after five years.
    *Value creation – We each will have transformed our understanding of what is value, and be actively creating a viable, collaborative economy.
    *Environmental footprint – We will reduce, reuse and recycle more. We will dramatically reduce our environmental footprint of our work by working locally and virtually, and sharing resources.

    We can work our way. We want to:

    * Create a livelihood for ourselves with all the necessary tools to succeed.
    * Realize our dreams by working on projects that interest you, not the other way around.
    * Learn valuable technology skills for the new economy.
    * Build a strong support network of dynamic, like-minded individuals to exchange ideas and collaborate.
    * Find the right people to help us accomplish goals.
    * Grow both personally and professionally through collaboration.
    * Share our wealth by mentoring and investing in other dreamfishers.

    We are happy, healthy and principled:

    Diversity principle

    Diversity is core to Dreamfish as a work community. We welcome people of any gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, color of skin, ethnicity, nationality, ability, class, income level, religion, culture, subculture, and political opinion.

    Collaborative Learning Principle

    We mutually support our growth and development. We learn from experiences. We learn by working together. As we do, we develop socially, ethically and professionally.

    We believe that when we jam ”with” our differences, not against, we innovate and transform. Resilient results can come when people from different worlds and world-views move as an organizational jam. A jam is a practice of presence. A jam is not a debate about rightness. It is not fight or flight. It is not positional arguments. Jamming is listening, really listening. It is saying, “Yes, And”.

    Staying with the conversation teaches us about what we did not know, and humbles us in the awareness that there is much more that we don’t know that we don’t know. We learn to live in the gap between what we thought we knew and what is possible. Jamming is not superflous to our work. Jamming is the work. As we practice to jam with one another, so, we emerge with what is possible in our work, in ourselves, and in the world.

    Sustainability Principle

    We actively make choices that mindfully supports the health of projects we work on, our coworkers, the earth and its creatures.

    We believe that sustainability goes beyond a triple bottom line of people, planet and profit. Physicality is core to what is sustainable work. We thrive with biodiversity here as we are part of the biodiversity of our planet. We believe accessibility for people with disabilities is a priority, not an afterthought. We think neurodiversity is a feature, not a bug. As we share the air with each other, our own breath reminds us that the self is common to both humanity and to the earth. Listening to our body, we learn that work is a practice, not a production. We learn that we are collaborative systems, not silos. We learn that our gut can make a critical decision, when the frontal cortex may not. We learn that our community is a dance, not a data set ;-) .

    Fishfood Principle

    We believe that we value differently.  You may value the deep satisfaction of putting money to work. I might value:  food and shelter. Learning. Accomplishment. As we work, we each listen to what we truly value and then can create this blended value through projects. As schools of fish, we create fishfood for all. Our revenue model is designed for diversity.

    Working Out Loud Principle

    We are as open and transparent in our work as possible to be highly efficient with resources, and allow more people to benefit from the work created. Many of us contribute to open source development, and Dreamfish is built with open source software. Working out Loud allows one coworker to easily learn from another coworker (e.g., on how to use a tool, how to run a meeting or manage a project). This is also why our main workspace is a wiki. If you want a private space, you are welcome to create one. This may take some adjustment, if you have worked behind a wall for awhile. But, those of us who have made the transition, find this new way of work liberating!

    We practice the work we want in the world:

    Guidelines are agreements that we make to our coworkers.

    We practice Respect

    Each person’s contribution in this community is valuable. We expect for each person to be treated with the upmost regard and respect. We respect people’s time, efforts, and expressions. Please see our Diversity Statement.

    We practice Extraordinary Project Management

    We want a healthy workplace throughout the whole cycle of work, from the early relationship-forming process through project management to project close outs. Project-based work can be an efficient flexible way to get work done. We can keep costs low. To enable this new way of work, we strive towards excellent project management practices. As we are at different skill levels of project management, we teach each other as we learn.

    We practice Effective Communication

    There are things we don’t know that we don’t know. By giving each other feedback, we can become more aware and more effective at work. Our perspectives are often different from each other. We check our own assumptions out directly with the other person. We strive to own our own interpretations and feelings about the situation. If need be, we ask for help to facilitate.

    We practice Responsibility.

    When we leave or disengage from the project, in whole or in part, we do so in a way that minimises disruption to the project.

    We treat creativity as a practice. We love creativity, especially collaborative forms that arise as people work together — from dance to video, from a code snippet to a page on the wiki, from the person who’s been doing this for decades to the person, who just picked up a video camera last week. We support maximum freedom of creative expression, while respecting our work communities. We will never put a limit on creativity just because it makes someone uncomfortable.

    We are learning as we go. We may not be able to satisfy everyone. We may not be able to provide for multiple languages or better accessibility as quickly as we would like. We each can certainly work to avoid offending anyone, and learn. And we can listen carefully and respectfully to each other. We can work together.

    We want a thriving workplace for everyone, everywhere.  We are not bosses and minions. We are not in or out of the workforce. We are not demographic groups. We are not producers and consumers. We’re people working with people.

    Please,  support this humanifesto by adding your name to the list on the wiki.

    ==== Attribution ====

    The context for this humanifesto:

    As a practice of diversity, this text is a remix, with much thanks to Dreamwidth for allowing us to repurpose text in their Diversity Statement. This text is usable under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA license.

    Our relations shape us. Many thanks to everyone who has contributed to Dreamfish on a journey over the last couple years to arrive at where we are now as a work cooperative.  In 2006 in the International Society for Systems Sciences, we began under the name of Dreamfish as a NGO project, to support systems scientists to collaboratively work on issues of sustainability, and democracy. In 2007 – 2009, we engaged thousands of social entrepreneurs to share resources with each other in projects with PopTech and Craigslist Foundation, Fielding Graduate Institute, Organization Development Network, Greenmuseum.org, and Planetwork. Several core dreamfishers meanwhile worked as Touchy-Feely group facilitators for Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Women in Management program. Now, as a community, we are going to come full circle. Now, with the belief, sweat and effort of a small staff, nearly 100 community members working on projects, 3000 supporters, and investors who believed in this woman entrepreneur (!), we are moving our vision to life.

    If you want to get involved, and volunteer on a Dreamfish project, we are looking for leaders, writers, programmers, operations folks, wiki contributors, investors and funders of open source projects. We are inviting employers who want workers to seed job opportunities to post jobs. We welcome you to join us in building Dreamfish.

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 4:51 am on July 21, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: change jam, innovation, knowledge   

    Playing into the Future with a Jam 

    The first Community Leadership Summit was terrific. The group of people who gathered for this summit were a smart mission-driven creative bunch, most of whom also are going this week to OSCON, the Open Source Convention. Free to register and held as an unconference, hats off to the organizer Jono Bacon, Community Manager for Ubuntu.

    During the conference, I co-led a project jam with Mei Lin Fung called Playing into the Future. The goal was to enable individuals to develop project ideas that build towards a positive future. Through the experience and use of artifacts produced in the session, participants could fuel their emerging work. They could also inspire new exhibits in the Program for the Future at The Tech, built upon the collaboration principles of Doug Engelbart, inventor of the mouse and whose team developed hypertext.

    To see what the group looked like in action, here’s a video clip of the session, filmed by Rich Reader.

    Serendipitously, Ubuntu has been running “jams” as well as informal meetups to have people come together to meet other Ubuntu community members and talk about Ubuntu shop. They will soon run another Ubuntu Global Jam. One of the things I like about the design is that by making it over a weekend, everyone can participate in a flexible way that suits their local needs.

    The jam methodology we used at the Community Leadership Summit was a derivitive of Change Jam, another open source event for project innovation. The first change jams were in San Francisco last year. In the tradition of group technologies,  a change jam has these defining characteristics:

    • start with building connectivity as the basis of social innovation, rather than focusing first on ideas or problem-solving
    • apply a performative approach to collaborative inquiry
    • further a shared goal to positively change the world

    A  jam is built upon improvisation principles, such as “Yes, And”, which is decidedly focused on amplifying the positive. To underline this point with a negative ;-) , a jam is not is a problem-solving session. Improvisers, when in an ensemble, practice listening and building upon the connectivity between people and ideas in order to create something new.

    Here are the  instructions for how to do a change jam. You really need three hours to move from forming relationships to project ideation to performance and then to value reflection and group ritual. However, in this session, we experimented with a micro hour version. But, I would recommend the full format, as it is important to have enough to time to set up well and to  generate critical reflection at the end.

    So, why do we do this? A  jam produces results that are not obvious at first, but can lay early ground work for collaborative production. There are four kinds of knowledge that can be produced in a jam:

    1. Relational Knowledge: Knowledge as relationship. When we are in a jam, we build new connections, as we are present, listening to each other. This kind of knowledge is fundamental for addressing the alienation of institutional knowledge, and is also the basis of forming the other kinds of knowledge.

    2. Practical Knowledge: Knowledge as  know-how. Knowledge is not a commodity to be pushed or pulled, but rather, something that we physically cultivate through aesthetic practice. In the jam, through practice and repetition of interaction, people begin to learn systems thinking, moving as an open fluid complex ensemble.

    3. Representational Knowledge: Information. We create meaning together as we see patterns and tell stories. Taking social construction and liberation pedagogy seriously, we involve participants in both appreciative inquiry and critical reflection.

    4. Responsive Knowledge: Stimulate innovation and adult development. The reason that performance, costuming and props are used in a jam are to enable people to experience themselves as practicing active agents in the process of innovation. Practicing performance skills, participants learn to work in the gap between the habits and possibilities unfolding. Based on Vygotskyian human development theory and East Asian philosophy, Responsive Knowledge treats knowledge as capacity to respond.

    Thanks to participants in this session:

    • Mei Lin Fung, Program for the Future
    • Rich Reader - videographer
    • Peter Kaminski - Social Software expert, Dreamfish Community Tech Maven
    • Cliff Figallo, GuildSmith – how local communities will network.
    • Chris, Ubuntu
    • Teresa, Open Solaris
    • Bob Ketner, Virtual Communities Manager at The Tech
    • Aaditya Batia, Developer Intern at The Tech
    • Michael Tiemann, open Science and Tech museum, Signis, RedHat
    • Stina Cooke, Museum Exhibit Designer formerly from Boston Science Museum
    • Veera Swaminathan, Singapore Ambassador for the Program for the Future Challenge
    • Grant Bowman, technologist

    Here are the session notes on the Community Leadership Summit wiki.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel