Posts Mentioning RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Tiffany von Emmel 5:10 am on June 1, 2011 Permalink  

    Swim Swim Self! 

    “If you were a grown up right now, what would you do?” Charlie Seashore

    photo by Sietske van Poelgeest

     

    The core tool of a network organization is not software. It is the Use of Self. A network of individuals working together requires that each of us acts as an agent of interrelatedness. Use of Self is actively practicing empathy with our relations, exercising awareness of our own assumptions and behavior in an interconnected world, and then making conscious choices in relationship.  (For more on Awareness and Choice, get to Edie Seashore’s workshop notes)

    Using a metaphor of a vital network in our lives, an ocean, when you see plastic bits of trash in your ocean, what do you do? do you empathize with the ocean creatures as part of yourself?  do you organize a Swim Fundraiser? stop using plastic bags from the store? make art with plastic trash? Create public policy about plastic? Share a link? Do you build a trash picking tool? What is your Use of Self?

    Network organizations work similarly. In a network, there is no boss or parent to tell us what to do. A network is not an institutional organization or family, where it is easy to regress into a passive state. A network can enable life to be richer for each individual. But, if we all expect someone else to be the one, to fix stuff, to pay for what we each use, then we end up with the Tragedy of the Commons. Our commons starts to look like a dump.

    In a network, what you get reflects what you put in. And, what you get also reflects what others put in. For example, Dreamfish Co-operative is a network of individuals working on a common dream to work like humans to realize our dreams. Out of thousands connecting to this vision, a few people are caring for the whole network: 5% of us are contributing time, energy and creativity to the whole network. When it comes to paying for the co-op infrastructure, out of pledged members, 1% of us pay for 90% of our costs. Only 15% of us have purchased our membership and 85% have not yet paid their share. Who gets the most out of the network? Yep, the 5% who contribute the most are the ones who report transformative learning, increased income and professional growth. But, we could do so much more if all of us exercised our Use of Self.

    Part of the reason that the network stats look like this is that I needed to shift my use of self as a leader. To remember that in this school of fish, I do not need to swim alone. So, I am reaching out to you and asking you to swim with me.

    My appeal is especially directed to you who swim in Dreamfish and networks supporting human development. Imagine shifting from a network of followers to a network of leaders. Imagine if 100% of us contributed a small bit of our time, money, energy and creativity to a network to build the support system that we each need. Imagine if each of us was responsible for building capacity that could support our individual work. Folks organizing local events. Senior consultants mentoring women and youth entrepreneurs in rural villages. Folks teaching online workshops. Developers building tools that help us connect. We hire each other. We volunteer to help do something that is easy for us, but may be hard for another. Imagine the value that would be liberated, the impact we could make!

    photo by Sietske van Poelgeest

    Here’s one way that small efforts make a big difference.  Please join me in launching a campaign for the opening of Dreamfish Place Nairobi, a place to physically and financially support the Dreamfish Cooperative’s mission to work like humans to realize our dreams. Your swimming means a lot to the network.  And, your swimming means a lot to me. Swim over here: http://www.indiegogo.com/Dreamfish-Nairobi

    Swim swim Self!

     
    • Suzy Gamblin 8:48 am on June 1, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Tiff,
      You are amazing! I wish much success for you and your endeavors. The world needs you and you are helping to create more good in the world. You’re an angel. Swim! Swim!!!
      XXXX I love ya!
      Suzy
      (cousin)

  • Tiffany von Emmel 3:41 pm on August 23, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: , New Ways to Work,   

    Dreamfish Humanifesto 

    [Note: the Humanifesto has evolved with tweaks and nudges. The current version is here. ]

    We want to flourish.

    We want a workplace, where everyone can create meaningful work. We can find happiness. We can thrive in our livelihoods.

    Dreamfish was born to create a new open world of good work for everyone, everywhere. Dreamfish is for us, all of us – the world’s women to work, get capital, move out of poverty or reenter a workforce or work in open source, for men to explore freely new ways to feel at work, for a person in recovery from anything to make a living, for a young genius to stretch wide, for elders to contribute experience, for the homeless to gain confidence, for a professional to learn creative out of the box skills, for the investor to contribute to what matters, for a young worker to gain meaningful work experience, free of silos. This is sustainability at work. This is ”our” world of work.

    We are welcoming. You may speak Urdu, Spanish or Chinese. You may identifiy as a woman or a man. You may wear a baby sling, hijab, a kippah, a suit, leather, piercings, a pentacle, a political badge, a rainbow, a rosary, tattoos, or something we can only dream of. You may carry a backpack, a guitar or knitting needles or a cane. Conservative or liberal, libertarian or socialist — we believe it’s possible for people of all viewpoints and persuasions to be agents of entrepreneurship. We welcome youth and elders, mothers, activists, professionals, artists, engineers, bloggers, crafters, academics, musicians, photographers, readers, writers, gardeners, ordinary people, extraordinary people, and everyone in between. We welcome people who want to change the world, people who want to do business, people who want to keep in touch, people who want to make great art. We welcome Internet beginners.

    We will thrive at work.
    In our future, we want for millions of us to have created more meaningful work, moved out of poverty, completed thousands of successful projects, and grown as people. We want to:
    *Increase sustainable income – Those of us who are below the poverty line will significantly increase our income and report an income that enables us to be self-sufficient.
    *Resilience – The Survival rate of micro-enterprises is extraordinarily high after five years.
    *Value creation – We each will have transformed our understanding of what is value, and be actively creating a viable, collaborative economy.
    *Environmental footprint – We will reduce, reuse and recycle more. We will dramatically reduce our environmental footprint of our work by working locally and virtually, and sharing resources.

    We can work our way. We want to:

    * Create a livelihood for ourselves with all the necessary tools to succeed.
    * Realize our dreams by working on projects that interest you, not the other way around.
    * Learn valuable technology skills for the new economy.
    * Build a strong support network of dynamic, like-minded individuals to exchange ideas and collaborate.
    * Find the right people to help us accomplish goals.
    * Grow both personally and professionally through collaboration.
    * Share our wealth by mentoring and investing in other dreamfishers.

    We are happy, healthy and principled:

    Diversity principle

    Diversity is core to Dreamfish as a work community. We welcome people of any gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, color of skin, ethnicity, nationality, ability, class, income level, religion, culture, subculture, and political opinion.

    Collaborative Learning Principle

    We mutually support our growth and development. We learn from experiences. We learn by working together. As we do, we develop socially, ethically and professionally.

    We believe that when we jam ”with” our differences, not against, we innovate and transform. Resilient results can come when people from different worlds and world-views move as an organizational jam. A jam is a practice of presence. A jam is not a debate about rightness. It is not fight or flight. It is not positional arguments. Jamming is listening, really listening. It is saying, “Yes, And”.

    Staying with the conversation teaches us about what we did not know, and humbles us in the awareness that there is much more that we don’t know that we don’t know. We learn to live in the gap between what we thought we knew and what is possible. Jamming is not superflous to our work. Jamming is the work. As we practice to jam with one another, so, we emerge with what is possible in our work, in ourselves, and in the world.

    Sustainability Principle

    We actively make choices that mindfully supports the health of projects we work on, our coworkers, the earth and its creatures.

    We believe that sustainability goes beyond a triple bottom line of people, planet and profit. Physicality is core to what is sustainable work. We thrive with biodiversity here as we are part of the biodiversity of our planet. We believe accessibility for people with disabilities is a priority, not an afterthought. We think neurodiversity is a feature, not a bug. As we share the air with each other, our own breath reminds us that the self is common to both humanity and to the earth. Listening to our body, we learn that work is a practice, not a production. We learn that we are collaborative systems, not silos. We learn that our gut can make a critical decision, when the frontal cortex may not. We learn that our community is a dance, not a data set ;-) .

    Fishfood Principle

    We believe that we value differently.  You may value the deep satisfaction of putting money to work. I might value:  food and shelter. Learning. Accomplishment. As we work, we each listen to what we truly value and then can create this blended value through projects. As schools of fish, we create fishfood for all. Our revenue model is designed for diversity.

    Working Out Loud Principle

    We are as open and transparent in our work as possible to be highly efficient with resources, and allow more people to benefit from the work created. Many of us contribute to open source development, and Dreamfish is built with open source software. Working out Loud allows one coworker to easily learn from another coworker (e.g., on how to use a tool, how to run a meeting or manage a project). This is also why our main workspace is a wiki. If you want a private space, you are welcome to create one. This may take some adjustment, if you have worked behind a wall for awhile. But, those of us who have made the transition, find this new way of work liberating!

    We practice the work we want in the world:

    Guidelines are agreements that we make to our coworkers.

    We practice Respect

    Each person’s contribution in this community is valuable. We expect for each person to be treated with the upmost regard and respect. We respect people’s time, efforts, and expressions. Please see our Diversity Statement.

    We practice Extraordinary Project Management

    We want a healthy workplace throughout the whole cycle of work, from the early relationship-forming process through project management to project close outs. Project-based work can be an efficient flexible way to get work done. We can keep costs low. To enable this new way of work, we strive towards excellent project management practices. As we are at different skill levels of project management, we teach each other as we learn.

    We practice Effective Communication

    There are things we don’t know that we don’t know. By giving each other feedback, we can become more aware and more effective at work. Our perspectives are often different from each other. We check our own assumptions out directly with the other person. We strive to own our own interpretations and feelings about the situation. If need be, we ask for help to facilitate.

    We practice Responsibility.

    When we leave or disengage from the project, in whole or in part, we do so in a way that minimises disruption to the project.

    We treat creativity as a practice. We love creativity, especially collaborative forms that arise as people work together — from dance to video, from a code snippet to a page on the wiki, from the person who’s been doing this for decades to the person, who just picked up a video camera last week. We support maximum freedom of creative expression, while respecting our work communities. We will never put a limit on creativity just because it makes someone uncomfortable.

    We are learning as we go. We may not be able to satisfy everyone. We may not be able to provide for multiple languages or better accessibility as quickly as we would like. We each can certainly work to avoid offending anyone, and learn. And we can listen carefully and respectfully to each other. We can work together.

    We want a thriving workplace for everyone, everywhere.  We are not bosses and minions. We are not in or out of the workforce. We are not demographic groups. We are not producers and consumers. We’re people working with people.

    Please,  support this humanifesto by adding your name to the list on the wiki.

    ==== Attribution ====

    The context for this humanifesto:

    As a practice of diversity, this text is a remix, with much thanks to Dreamwidth for allowing us to repurpose text in their Diversity Statement. This text is usable under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA license.

    Our relations shape us. Many thanks to everyone who has contributed to Dreamfish on a journey over the last couple years to arrive at where we are now as a work cooperative.  In 2006 in the International Society for Systems Sciences, we began under the name of Dreamfish as a NGO project, to support systems scientists to collaboratively work on issues of sustainability, and democracy. In 2007 – 2009, we engaged thousands of social entrepreneurs to share resources with each other in projects with PopTech and Craigslist Foundation, Fielding Graduate Institute, Organization Development Network, Greenmuseum.org, and Planetwork. Several core dreamfishers meanwhile worked as Touchy-Feely group facilitators for Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Women in Management program. Now, as a community, we are going to come full circle. Now, with the belief, sweat and effort of a small staff, nearly 100 community members working on projects, 3000 supporters, and investors who believed in this woman entrepreneur (!), we are moving our vision to life.

    If you want to get involved, and volunteer on a Dreamfish project, we are looking for leaders, writers, programmers, operations folks, wiki contributors, investors and funders of open source projects. We are inviting employers who want workers to seed job opportunities to post jobs. We welcome you to join us in building Dreamfish.

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 4:51 am on July 21, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: change jam, innovation, knowledge   

    Playing into the Future with a Jam 

    The first Community Leadership Summit was terrific. The group of people who gathered for this summit were a smart mission-driven creative bunch, most of whom also are going this week to OSCON, the Open Source Convention. Free to register and held as an unconference, hats off to the organizer Jono Bacon, Community Manager for Ubuntu.

    During the conference, I co-led a project jam with Mei Lin Fung called Playing into the Future. The goal was to enable individuals to develop project ideas that build towards a positive future. Through the experience and use of artifacts produced in the session, participants could fuel their emerging work. They could also inspire new exhibits in the Program for the Future at The Tech, built upon the collaboration principles of Doug Engelbart, inventor of the mouse and whose team developed hypertext.

    To see what the group looked like in action, here’s a video clip of the session, filmed by Rich Reader.

    Serendipitously, Ubuntu has been running “jams” as well as informal meetups to have people come together to meet other Ubuntu community members and talk about Ubuntu shop. They will soon run another Ubuntu Global Jam. One of the things I like about the design is that by making it over a weekend, everyone can participate in a flexible way that suits their local needs.

    The jam methodology we used at the Community Leadership Summit was a derivitive of Change Jam, another open source event for project innovation. The first change jams were in San Francisco last year. In the tradition of group technologies,  a change jam has these defining characteristics:

    • start with building connectivity as the basis of social innovation, rather than focusing first on ideas or problem-solving
    • apply a performative approach to collaborative inquiry
    • further a shared goal to positively change the world

    A  jam is built upon improvisation principles, such as “Yes, And”, which is decidedly focused on amplifying the positive. To underline this point with a negative ;-) , a jam is not is a problem-solving session. Improvisers, when in an ensemble, practice listening and building upon the connectivity between people and ideas in order to create something new.

    Here are the  instructions for how to do a change jam. You really need three hours to move from forming relationships to project ideation to performance and then to value reflection and group ritual. However, in this session, we experimented with a micro hour version. But, I would recommend the full format, as it is important to have enough to time to set up well and to  generate critical reflection at the end.

    So, why do we do this? A  jam produces results that are not obvious at first, but can lay early ground work for collaborative production. There are four kinds of knowledge that can be produced in a jam:

    1. Relational Knowledge: Knowledge as relationship. When we are in a jam, we build new connections, as we are present, listening to each other. This kind of knowledge is fundamental for addressing the alienation of institutional knowledge, and is also the basis of forming the other kinds of knowledge.

    2. Practical Knowledge: Knowledge as  know-how. Knowledge is not a commodity to be pushed or pulled, but rather, something that we physically cultivate through aesthetic practice. In the jam, through practice and repetition of interaction, people begin to learn systems thinking, moving as an open fluid complex ensemble.

    3. Representational Knowledge: Information. We create meaning together as we see patterns and tell stories. Taking social construction and liberation pedagogy seriously, we involve participants in both appreciative inquiry and critical reflection.

    4. Responsive Knowledge: Stimulate innovation and adult development. The reason that performance, costuming and props are used in a jam are to enable people to experience themselves as practicing active agents in the process of innovation. Practicing performance skills, participants learn to work in the gap between the habits and possibilities unfolding. Based on Vygotskyian human development theory and East Asian philosophy, Responsive Knowledge treats knowledge as capacity to respond.

    Thanks to participants in this session:

    • Mei Lin Fung, Program for the Future
    • Rich Reader - videographer
    • Peter Kaminski - Social Software expert, Dreamfish Community Tech Maven
    • Cliff Figallo, GuildSmith – how local communities will network.
    • Chris, Ubuntu
    • Teresa, Open Solaris
    • Bob Ketner, Virtual Communities Manager at The Tech
    • Aaditya Batia, Developer Intern at The Tech
    • Michael Tiemann, open Science and Tech museum, Signis, RedHat
    • Stina Cooke, Museum Exhibit Designer formerly from Boston Science Museum
    • Veera Swaminathan, Singapore Ambassador for the Program for the Future Challenge
    • Grant Bowman, technologist

    Here are the session notes on the Community Leadership Summit wiki.

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 4:36 pm on July 7, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: , microenterprise, poverty,   

    Why Dreamfish? Microenterprises increase incomes and reduce poverty 

    The vision of Dreamfish is a global work network of independent people who collaborate on work and change their own lives and the world in the process. We are now at the time that there is market awareness and urgent need for new ways to organize our economy. The facts are apparent, and eyes are open.

    Trend to Micro for Millions

    Many of us are looking for a new way to work. Many are on the margins, with 195 million unemployed worldwide. Millions have already discovered entrepreneurship as a way out. There are 21.5 million microenterprises (businesses with five or fewer employees), just in the United States.

    Micro-enterprise programs show results.

    Several major studies on the effects on micro-enterprise on low-income and moderate-income individuals show that micro-enterprises assist to move individuals out of poverty. A five year study of Aspen’s Self-employment Learning Project showed the following results:

    • Increase in Income - The poor raised annual income by average of $10,507.
    • 53% Out of poverty – Reliance on public assistance benefits declined significantly in dollars and number of recipients.
    • 57% Business survival rate – 57% were in business after five years. This is favorable to small business’ 40% survival rate.
    • Women powered – Most micro-enterprises are women. In this study, 78% were women entrepreneurs.

    The Dreamfish Way – Real. Relational. Resilient.

    Building on best practices within micro-enterprise development, Open Source network economies, and pioneering organization development, Dreamfish is a way for independent workers and job providers to find work, hire, collaborate and pay. As entrepreneurs, we learn as we practice a new way to work that sustains us, financially and personally. We also reduce our environmental footprint by working virtually and sharing resources. Here’s how we do it:

    • Lower costs and higher effectiveness. Using free tools and a peer-to-peer open source model.
    • Empowered. There is no middle man in our exchange. Nobody looks over our shoulder.
    • Collaborative economy. Two fish swim better than one.
    • Woman-friendly. We appeal to women, who are underserved. Most micro-entrepreneurs are women. Yet, women have little access to capital. Only 5% of VC funding goes to women, and most entrepreneurial brands target men.
    • Growthful – Success is personal.  Confidence, balance and happiness are measures of success.
    • We can scale our model to support good work for millions. Unlike nonprofit micro-enterprise programs, Dreamfish can grow big, well.

    Sustainable work for us all is within our reach. We have proven approaches. Our tools are available. The timing is right. Together, we can create sustainable work for all of us. If you want to support the Dreamfish Way, please get involved.

    Go heart to Dreamfish.

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 4:49 am on June 7, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: ,   

    Invest in young women 

    If you want to invest in sustainability, then invest in women entrepreneurs. Globally, young women are the most likely change agents. However, invisibility and lack of access to capital inhibits their capacity. Here is an awareness-raising video from Girl Effect.

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 10:24 am on May 7, 2009 Permalink
    Tags: , network   

    Nets work with Mixedink and Verna Allee 

    A few days ago, Peter Kaminski and I went to Tedx in San Francisco.  I especially wanted to connect  with friend, Verna Allee, whose work is on Value Networks, and Vanessa and Dan Scanfeld, of Mixedink (read about Mixedink below).  

    At the event, Verna told a great story about how she and her partner started up a large-scale distributed network organization of independents as a response to economic hardship. This was a 1970′s forerunner to dreamfishing! This then led to her study of value networks.

    Ironically, the Tedx event design was far from enabling of the value network among event participants. Tedx is supposed to be a community-owned version of the TED conference. As an expert in social design, I found the event design to be sorely wanting, as the top-down TED format was maintained, and in a rigid way, despite the intention to deliver on high participation.

    However, as these things go, the people that the event attracted were fantastic. Speaking of high participation social design, meeting with Mixedink’s founder, Vanessa Scanfeld and Dan Scanfeld, her partner and lead developer was inspiring. I quickly became a Mixedink fan. Mixedink as a web service enables a group, from 10 people to 500 people or more to collaboratively create a shared document with a goal of consensus. Below is a video from Mixedink. For example, a good application of Mixedink would be for TED fans to use Mixedink to develop a design for Tedx. Wink.  Check out Mixedink.

    MixedInk Demo from MixedInk on Vimeo.

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 4:05 am on September 9, 2007 Permalink
    Tags: consulting, ,   

    hammers and buckets 

    The conversations I like to be in are about helping people to join together in enlivening ways to learn, grow as humans and work for a better world. What pains me is when I see an alienating social experience where people are regressing, bored, isolating, checking out and acting out. To know what I mean, think back to school (or maybe yesterday at work:) , as boredom and alienation thrive in institutions. However, pain motivates people to do something differently. So, often, I am called in to problem-solve – to fix the pain in a system and design an experience like a conference, an organizational change initiative or a social ritual, where it is perceived that something has not gone quite right before. Helping to fix the pain is an opportunity to begin to effect some transformation in the organization or community.

    Ironically, the problem-solving that brought me to the situation often runs amock in the system. Hammers and buckets are brought out, where no hammers and buckets are needed. Now, problem-solving as a technique has its place, but it is used as a method far more than is appropriate, when learning, human growth and systemic change in an organization or community are what is desired…. Even in a situation that works beautifully!! Often, a situation doesn't need the fixing force of a hammer or the containment of buckets, but that's what get used anyway. Hammers come in the form of content experts, models, tools, theories and controlling behaviors. Buckets come in the form of increasing control measures, more oversight, siloing people into functional and topical boxes.

    I also have my favorite hammers and buckets. I'm very fond of them and I think they work. But, life is too complex for templates. So, the problem-solving I prefer is limited to critically identifying undesired patterns in a system to determine what difference is desired. Beyond this, I shift my thinking into an ongoing "relational creative" process, not a critical problem-solving mode. "Collaboration is more of an art, not a science" (Tapscott and Williams, Wikinomics). To imagine what I would as a social designer and facilitator, I first look with the client at what are the goals and vision for the future, the situation, who is involved, the space and the time, the resources available to then together create a social design. And then using the design as an initial structure, facilitators show up in the present moment to make creative relational choices.

    The pattern of "I gotta fix this" arises when people feel out of control, want to feel more influential, and/or are in pain. And in a complex fluid creative situation, the need for control will come up. Particularly, for managers and organizers who are real good hammer and bucket makers. So, I then see how I can help leaders and facilitators to feel more interconnected, become aware of their influence and increase their sense of self-efficacy. When people feel both more connected to what is around them and confident in their ability to make creative choices, they then have a higher tolerance for ambiguity and are more likely to make choices that are good for the whole.

    In our hearts, I believe that humans want education and work to foster the experience of creativity and freedom, not control. Learning and growth need respecting, nurturing, connecting, playing, noticing best practices and doing more of that. Social design is an improvisational art craft. And, as with any craft, there comes a little hammering and bucketing. A little. Life is not a problem to be fixed. Life is to be embraced.

     

     
  • Tiffany von Emmel 4:54 am on March 29, 2007 Permalink
    Tags: ,   

    Network versus organization 

    Yesterday, I was talking with Kaliya Hamlin, the Identity Woman. We had both been at Nexus for Change and were debriefing. We were discussing the difference between networks and traditional organizations and how change methods developed for organizations don't necessarily apply to transforming social networks of individuals. Online community-builders and community organizers may be more familiar with influencing networks. But, organizational consultants are not generally trained to have a network mind.

    Networks can be decentralized, clustering, or centralized. Traditional organizations may seem to have a clear center of power and influence. Some organizations are organized more like decentralized network. Ori Brafman's Starfish and the Spider gives a great introduction to these artful things. Now, organizations also have social networks, which are usually not apparent at first glance, but they can be identified with Social Network Analysis. In decentralized networks, individuals are more loosely coupled. So, getting everyone into the same room for a visioning process is not doable, because who is everyone in the system, anyway? Identity is fuzzy and in flux.

    The way that I think about networks comes from my former life of being a Shiatsu therapist, using Chinese Medicine. Seeing the self as a network of energy meridians in a large ecosystem of meridians, I think similarly about social networks. The task of influencing change becomes one of tracking, attracting and dispersing energy to create vitality and dynamic balance. The use of self to influence becomes much more important in a decentralized network.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel